PRO Wiki:General disclaimer - Revision history

Naero at 17:32, 30 October 2019

2019-10-30T17:32:05Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:32, 30 October 2019
Line 3:		Line 3:
	In order to facilitate that goal, we have enabled editing of most pages to any registered users to help pluralize the manpower of our editorship. One of the drawbacks of that collaborative editability is that the pages are subjected to vandalism and inadequately developed/maintained pages, since this volunteer-driven, openly editable wiki predominantly depends on unselectedly registered users to maintain it: as such, we can not guarantee wholly consistent veracity, completion, and up-to-date accuracy of its content at all times.		In order to facilitate that goal, we have enabled editing of most pages to any registered users to help pluralize the manpower of our editorship. One of the drawbacks of that collaborative editability is that the pages are subjected to vandalism and inadequately developed/maintained pages, since this volunteer-driven, openly editable wiki predominantly depends on unselectedly registered users to maintain it: as such, we can not guarantee wholly consistent veracity, completion, and up-to-date accuracy of its content at all times.

	That is not to suggest that this source will not be dependable; you might have known some that considered [https://www.wikipedia.org/ Wikipedia] discreditable under the same rationale that it's widely editable, but how much content have you examined on it that you can truly say is inaccurate? All collectively volunteer-driven wikis are susceptible to vandalistic misinformation and potentially obscene content, but a ''well-maintained'' wiki will seldom see ~~field~~ those results.		That is not to suggest that this source will not be dependable; you might have known some that considered [https://www.wikipedia.org/ Wikipedia] discreditable under the same rationale that it's widely editable, but how much content have you examined on it that you can truly say is inaccurate? All collectively volunteer-driven wikis are susceptible to vandalistic misinformation and potentially obscene content, but a ''well-maintained'' wiki will seldom see those results.

	Through a combination of protected pages for the more accuracy-sensitive pages, an active bureau of wiki-editors to monitor, moderate and maintain the wiki, a cohesive goal of validity to the wiki's information, and other countervandalistic measures, we plan to ensure minimality to any potentially unreliable content.		Through a combination of protected pages for the more accuracy-sensitive pages, an active bureau of wiki-editors to monitor, moderate and maintain the wiki, a cohesive goal of validity to the wiki's information, and other countervandalistic measures, we plan to ensure minimality to any potentially unreliable content.

	The bottom line is that the wiki is still subject to misinformation—be it attributable to deliberately vandalistic editing, unpunctilious editing, or ingenuous mistakes on the editors' parts—and while we don't want any regularity out of it, it will always be a susceptibility; as such, we must disclaim any responsibility for content that you may find harmful, offensive or misinformative.		The bottom line is that the wiki is still subject to misinformation—be it attributable to deliberately vandalistic editing, unpunctilious editing, or ingenuous mistakes on the editors' parts—and while we don't want any regularity out of it, it will always be a susceptibility; as such, we must disclaim any responsibility for content that you may find harmful, offensive or misinformative.

Naero at 12:33, 13 January 2017

2017-01-13T12:33:03Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:33, 13 January 2017
Line 3:		Line 3:
	In order to facilitate that goal, we have enabled editing of most pages to any registered users to help pluralize the manpower of our editorship. One of the drawbacks of that collaborative editability is that the pages are subjected to vandalism and inadequately developed/maintained pages, since this volunteer-driven, openly editable wiki predominantly depends on unselectedly registered users to maintain it: as such, we can not guarantee wholly consistent veracity, completion, and up-to-date accuracy of its content at all times.		In order to facilitate that goal, we have enabled editing of most pages to any registered users to help pluralize the manpower of our editorship. One of the drawbacks of that collaborative editability is that the pages are subjected to vandalism and inadequately developed/maintained pages, since this volunteer-driven, openly editable wiki predominantly depends on unselectedly registered users to maintain it: as such, we can not guarantee wholly consistent veracity, completion, and up-to-date accuracy of its content at all times.

	That is not to suggest that this source will not be dependable; you ~~may~~ known some that ~~consider~~ [https://www.wikipedia.org/ Wikipedia] discreditable under the same rationale that it's widely editable, but how much content have you examined on it that you can truly say is inaccurate? All collectively volunteer-driven wikis are susceptible to vandalistic misinformation and potentially obscene content, but a ''well-maintained'' wiki will seldom see field those results.		That is not to suggest that this source will not be dependable; you might have known some that considered [https://www.wikipedia.org/ Wikipedia] discreditable under the same rationale that it's widely editable, but how much content have you examined on it that you can truly say is inaccurate? All collectively volunteer-driven wikis are susceptible to vandalistic misinformation and potentially obscene content, but a ''well-maintained'' wiki will seldom see field those results.

	Through a combination of protected pages for the more accuracy-sensitive pages, an active bureau of wiki-editors to monitor, moderate and maintain the wiki, a cohesive goal of validity to the wiki's information, and other countervandalistic measures, we plan to ensure minimality to any potentially unreliable content.		Through a combination of protected pages for the more accuracy-sensitive pages, an active bureau of wiki-editors to monitor, moderate and maintain the wiki, a cohesive goal of validity to the wiki's information, and other countervandalistic measures, we plan to ensure minimality to any potentially unreliable content.

	The bottom line is that the wiki is still subject to misinformation—be it attributable to deliberately vandalistic editing, unpunctilious editing, or ingenuous mistakes on the editors' parts—and while we don't want any regularity out of it, it will always be a susceptibility; as such, we must disclaim any responsibility for content that you may find harmful, offensive or misinformative.		The bottom line is that the wiki is still subject to misinformation—be it attributable to deliberately vandalistic editing, unpunctilious editing, or ingenuous mistakes on the editors' parts—and while we don't want any regularity out of it, it will always be a susceptibility; as such, we must disclaim any responsibility for content that you may find harmful, offensive or misinformative.

Naero: Protected "Pokemon Revolution Online Wiki:General disclaimer" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))

2016-12-18T21:05:07Z

Protected "Pokemon Revolution Online Wiki:General disclaimer" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))

← Older revision	Revision as of 21:05, 18 December 2016
(No difference)

Naero at 20:58, 17 December 2016

2016-12-17T20:58:34Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:58, 17 December 2016
Line 7:		Line 7:
	Through a combination of protected pages for the more accuracy-sensitive pages, an active bureau of wiki-editors to monitor, moderate and maintain the wiki, a cohesive goal of validity to the wiki's information, and other countervandalistic measures, we plan to ensure minimality to any potentially unreliable content.		Through a combination of protected pages for the more accuracy-sensitive pages, an active bureau of wiki-editors to monitor, moderate and maintain the wiki, a cohesive goal of validity to the wiki's information, and other countervandalistic measures, we plan to ensure minimality to any potentially unreliable content.

	The bottom line is that the wiki is still subject to misinformation—be it attributable to deliberately vandalistic editing, unpunctilious editing, or ingenuous mistakes on the editors' parts—and while we don't want any regularity out of it, it will always be a susceptibility.		The bottom line is that the wiki is still subject to misinformation—be it attributable to deliberately vandalistic editing, unpunctilious editing, or ingenuous mistakes on the editors' parts—and while we don't want any regularity out of it, it will always be a susceptibility; as such, we must disclaim any responsibility for content that you may find harmful, offensive or misinformative.

Naero: Created page with "{{SITENAME}}'s goal is to furnish a wiki with utmost accuracy, breadth, clarity, and credibility to all contents therein. In order to facilitate that goal, we have enabled ed..."

2016-12-17T20:56:56Z

Created page with "{{SITENAME}}'s goal is to furnish a wiki with utmost accuracy, breadth, clarity, and credibility to all contents therein. In order to facilitate that goal, we have enabled ed..."

New page

{{SITENAME}}'s goal is to furnish a wiki with utmost accuracy, breadth, clarity, and credibility to all contents therein.

In order to facilitate that goal, we have enabled editing of most pages to any registered users to help pluralize the manpower of our editorship. One of the drawbacks of that collaborative editability is that the pages are subjected to vandalism and inadequately developed/maintained pages, since this volunteer-driven, openly editable wiki predominantly depends on unselectedly registered users to maintain it: as such, we can not guarantee wholly consistent veracity, completion, and up-to-date accuracy of its content at all times.

That is not to suggest that this source will not be dependable; you may known some that consider [https://www.wikipedia.org/ Wikipedia] discreditable under the same rationale that it's widely editable, but how much content have you examined on it that you can truly say is inaccurate? All collectively volunteer-driven wikis are susceptible to vandalistic misinformation and potentially obscene content, but a ''well-maintained'' wiki will seldom see field those results.

Through a combination of protected pages for the more accuracy-sensitive pages, an active bureau of wiki-editors to monitor, moderate and maintain the wiki, a cohesive goal of validity to the wiki's information, and other countervandalistic measures, we plan to ensure minimality to any potentially unreliable content.

The bottom line is that the wiki is still subject to misinformation—be it attributable to deliberately vandalistic editing, unpunctilious editing, or ingenuous mistakes on the editors' parts—and while we don't want any regularity out of it, it will always be a susceptibility.